Working with Grief

Working with Grief

Guidance for counsellors, therapists and mental health professionals

Trauma + complicated grief

Understand when grief becomes more complex and how trauma-informed approaches can support processing.

๐Ÿ’Œ Be first to hear about upcoming webinars for therapists.

Introduction

For therapists and mental health professionals, working with grief involves understanding how loss affects not only emotion, but also identity, meaning, relationships, and a personโ€™s sense of safety in the world.

In clinical practice, grief rarely presents in a linear or predictable way. Clients may move between deep distress and relative stability, or experience conflicting emotions that feel difficult to hold. Contemporary research has consistently shown that grief is best understood as a dynamic and oscillating process rather than a fixed sequence of stages (Stroebe & Schut, 1999).

For therapists, this means resisting the urge to interpret fluctuating emotions as regression. Instead, help clients make sense of these shifts as part of adapting to loss, while remaining attentive to their individual needs and how they are functioning over time.

This flowchart illustrates how we conceptualise the distinction between integrated grief responses and more complex or complicated grief presentations. This framework helps clinicians focus on adaptation, risk, and how grief becomes integrated into a personโ€™s life, rather than labelling it โ€œnormalโ€ or โ€œabnormal.โ€

This kind of formulation can be particularly helpful in guiding clinical decision-making – especially when considering pacing, stabilisation, and the most appropriate therapeutic approach. As Neimeyer (2015) highlights, bereaved individuals are often not only seeking relief from distress, but also trying to make sense of a world that no longer feels coherent or familiar.

In this short video, Dr Kirsten V Smith explores the widely misunderstood โ€œfive stages of griefโ€ and explains why grief is far more complex, individual, and non-linear than stage-based models suggest. A helpful introduction for anyone supporting bereaved people or seeking a more realistic understanding of how grief unfolds.

At The Loss Foundation, our approach is integrative, evidence-informed, and grounded in real-world clinical and group experience with bereaved people.

We move away from rigid stage-based interpretations of grief and instead focus on understanding the ongoing, adaptive processes that shape how people respond to loss over time. This includes recognising when grief is naturally evolving, and when additional support may be needed where symptoms become more prolonged, complex, or distressing.

Importantly, we also acknowledge how widely misunderstood traditional models such as the โ€œfive stages of griefโ€ can be in both clinical and public discourse. Many service users tell us they feel these models do not reflect their lived experience and can sometimes create unnecessary pressure or self-judgement.

โœ”๏ธ Explore key grief theories and psychological models
โœ”๏ธ Understand anticipatory grief and its impact
โœ”๏ธ Analyse real-world case studies in grief support
โœ”๏ธ Learn how to help clients maintain continuing bonds
โœ”๏ธ Discover evidence-based support recommendations

Grief models

Grief is not a single, uniform experience, and over time several psychological models have been developed to help describe the different ways people respond to loss.

Early frameworks, such as the well-known Kรผbler-Ross model, identified five stages – denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. Originally developed through Kรผbler-Ross’s work with people facing their own mortality, the model was later applied more widely to bereavement. Although it remains influential and can help people recognise common emotional responses, it was not intended as a rigid sequence. We now understand that grief is rarely linear. People do not move neatly from one stage to another, and may revisit emotions or experience several at once.

In practice, therapists should avoid using stage-based models as a checklist for progress or expecting clients to experience grief in a particular order. Instead, explore how each client understands their experience and use this to guide therapeutic conversations.

Diagram illustrating the Continuing Bonds model of grief. The image shows a person maintaining an ongoing psychological connection with someone who has died. This connection is represented through memory, internal dialogue, shared values, and continuing influence in daily life. Rather than detaching or โ€œletting go,โ€ the model emphasises an enduring bond that is integrated into the personโ€™s ongoing life and identity after bereavement.

Other models, such as continuing bonds theory and meaning reconstruction approaches, emphasise that maintaining an ongoing inner connection with the person who has died can be a healthy and natural part of adapting to bereavement.

For therapists, this means recognising that adapting to loss does not necessarily involve letting go of the person who has died. Exploring memories, rituals and continuing connections can help clients make sense of the relationship and find ways to carry it forward that feel meaningful to them.

This ongoing connection might take many forms, including,

  • Speaking to the person internally or feeling their presence in everyday life
  • Preserving rituals or habits that were meaningful within the relationship
  • Keeping or using personal items that evoke a sense of closeness
  • Drawing on memories as a source of comfort, guidance, or strength
  • Continuing to celebrate important dates or milestones in ways that feel meaningful
  • Sharing stories or memories of the person with others to keep their legacy alive

They also suggest that finding new meaning in the loss is an important aspect of adjustment, helping individuals integrate the experience into their ongoing life. Together, these perspectives highlight that grief is highly individual, dynamic, and shaped by personal, cultural, and situational factors, for example –

  • The availability of social support and wider life context
  • Personal relationships and the nature of the attachment to the deceased
  • Cultural and religious beliefs that shape mourning practices and expression of grief
  • The circumstances of the death (e.g., sudden versus expected loss)
  • Previous experiences of loss and how these have shaped the person’s understanding of grief.

These factors can help therapists develop an individualised understanding of a client’s grief. Rather than applying a single model to every person, consider their relationship with the person who died, previous experiences of loss, cultural context, available support and the circumstances of the death. Therapeutic approaches should be guided by the individual’s needs, rather than expectations about how grief should unfold.

While no single model can fully explain the experience of grief, psychological frameworks can offer valuable insight into the many ways people respond to loss. Below are examples from our Grief Journey Workbook, introducing several of the most widely recognised approaches to understanding bereavement. These resources help illustrate the diverse ways grief can be experienced and understood.

๐Ÿ‘‰ The Five Stages of Grief: a useful map, or an outdated story? (LinkedIn)

๐Ÿ‘‰ The Evolution of Grief: From Letting Go to Staying Connected (LinkedIn)

๐Ÿ‘‰ Continuing Bonds Theory in Grief Counselling

๐Ÿ‘‰ Understanding Grief Through Psychological Models

Grief therapy often benefits from drawing on a range of therapeutic approaches, allowing clinicians to respond to the unique needs of each bereaved client. Different approaches offer valuable perspectives on emotions, thoughts, behaviours, meaning-making, and self-compassion, helping therapists support clients in navigating grief in a flexible and individualised way.

Comparison infographic showing three therapeutic approaches commonly used in grief work: Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT), Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT). The infographic compares each approach's core focus, how it can support bereaved clients, and key therapeutic techniques. CFT focuses on developing self-compassion and reducing shame and self-criticism. ACT focuses on accepting difficult emotions while reconnecting with personal values and meaning. CBT focuses on understanding the relationship between thoughts, feelings and behaviours and addressing patterns that may maintain distress. The infographic highlights how these approaches can be used individually or integrated to support grief therapy.

Explore further how Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT), Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) may benefit your grief work:

ApproachCore focusHow it can support grief workKey therapeutic tools
Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT)Developing compassion, reducing shame and self-criticismHelps clients respond to their grief with kindness, especially where loss brings guilt, anger, shame, or harsh self-judgementCompassionate imagery, soothing systems, self-compassion practices, emotional regulation
Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT)Making space for difficult experiences while moving towards valuesSupports clients to make space for painful grief emotions, while reconnecting with personal values and engaging in meaningful activities.Acceptance, mindfulness, cognitive defusion, values work, committed action
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)Understanding the relationship between thoughts, feelings, and behavioursHelps clients explore unhelpful grief-related thoughts, avoidance and coping behaviours that may be contributing to ongoing distress.Cognitive restructuring, behavioural strategies, coping skills, thought monitoring

In clinical practice, the choice of approach should be guided by the client’s needs rather than a one-size-fits-all model. CFT may be helpful where grief is accompanied by shame or self-criticism, ACT where clients are struggling to make space for painful emotions, and CBT where patterns of thinking or avoidance are contributing to distress. These approaches can also be integrated as the therapeutic work develops.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Meaning-Making After Loss โ€“ Rebuilding Narrative, Identity, and Continuing Bonds

๐Ÿ‘‰ Working with Traumatic Memories in Grief โ€“ Clinical Considerations for Therapists

๐Ÿ‘‰ Why Compassion Focused Therapy is a Powerful Tool in Grief Work

๐Ÿ‘‰ Grief and Identity: Who Am I Now? (LinkedIn)

๐Ÿ‘‰ Compassion Focused Therapy in Grief Work: Understanding the Inner World of the Bereaved Person (LinkedIn)

Trauma and complicated grief can significantly shape how a person experiences and processes loss, and it is important for therapists to recognise when grief has become more complex or is intertwined with traumatic responses. While grief itself is a natural response to loss, complicated grief may involve prolonged, intense, or disabling symptoms that interfere with daily functioning. When trauma is also present – whether related to the circumstances of the death, witnessing a loved one’s deterioration, or other distressing experiences surrounding the loss โ€“ clients may experience intrusive memories, hyperarousal, avoidance, or feelings of shock that overlap with grief reactions.

In clinical work, supporting trauma and complicated grief often requires a more paced, stabilising approach before deeper grief processing can take place. This may include grounding techniques, emotional regulation strategies, and careful attention to safety and window of tolerance. An integrative, trauma-informed approach helps therapists hold both the grief and the trauma responses together, recognising that healing is not linear and may involve oscillating between processing loss, managing distress, and rebuilding a sense of stability and meaning.

For therapists, this means paying attention to how clients respond when the loss is discussed. If a client becomes overwhelmed, grounding, emotional regulation and a sense of safety may need to take priority before more detailed exploration. The aim is not to avoid grief, but to help clients engage with it at a manageable pace.

Grief reactions exist on a spectrum and may evolve over time depending on the circumstances of the loss, prior trauma history, and available support. While many individuals experience acute grief that fluctuates and gradually becomes more integrated, others develop patterns of persistent, dysregulated, or trauma-linked grief responses. The table below outlines key clinical features that may help differentiate these presentations and guide therapeutic focus.

Clinical note: These presentations are not mutually exclusive, and grief does not follow a fixed trajectory. Intense emotions, trauma responses and periods of reduced functioning can all occur within natural grief. The persistence, impact and context of these experiences are important when considering whether additional therapeutic support may be helpful.

The following table outlines what therapists may notice in the room, what these observations might suggest, and how they can inform therapeutic support.

Ultimately, working well with grief is less about knowing the โ€˜rightโ€™ model and more about developing the confidence to stay alongside uncertainty, formulate thoughtfully and tailor therapy to the person in front of you.

Models and therapeutic approaches can guide the work, but they are tools rather than prescriptions. Good grief therapy remains curious, flexible and grounded in the individual experience of loss.

Our grief courses + resources…

Our practical grief courses and resources help therapists and mental health professionals work with grief with greater confidence, compassion, and clarity – combining psychological understanding with tools you can use directly in your clinical practice.

๐Ÿ’› Practicing Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT) in Grief Work

Learn how to apply compassion-focused techniques and evidence-based practices to help individuals navigate grief with kindness and resilience.

๐Ÿง  Formulating Grief –Psychological Models

Explore key grief theories, anticipatory grief, and real-world case studies to strengthen your therapeutic approach and support practice.

How should therapists integrate grief models in clinical practice?

Grief models are best used as formulation tools rather than rigid frameworks. Approaches such as the Dual Process Model, Continuing Bonds, and Attachment Theory can be integrated to support clinical understanding, guide case formulation, and inform flexible intervention planning.

How does contemporary grief therapy move beyond stage-based models?

Modern grief practice does not conceptualise bereavement as a linear stage process. Instead, it emphasises oscillation, adaptation, and meaning reconstruction. Stage models may be used descriptively, but are not typically used as treatment targets or indicators of progress.

When should therapists consider grief as complicated or trauma-related?

Prolonged grief may be considered when grief-related distress remains persistent, pervasive and significantly interferes with daily functioning over time, taking account of cultural and individual circumstances. Trauma-related responses may include intrusive memories, avoidance or heightened arousal, sometimes linked to distressing experiences surrounding the illness or death. Careful assessment can help therapists distinguish these experiences and identify appropriate support.

Can CBT, ACT, and CFT be integrated in grief work?

Yes. Third-wave and cognitive-behavioural approaches are commonly integrated within grief therapy. CBT may support cognitive and behavioural formulation, ACT can facilitate acceptance and values-based adaptation, and CFT is often useful in addressing shame, self-criticism, and affect regulation within bereavement work.


Become confident in bereavement support.